Nick Kocz's Ridiculous Words
  • SM Thayer
  • About
  • Writing
  • Contact
  • Blog

So Why Does Everyone ♥ Heart?

3/9/2011

 
Picture
Andy Warhol, Heart, c. 1984
Occasionally, people complain that my fiction lacks emotional depth.  Something about the way I write pushes at readers, making my work not as “accessible” as some would like.  Mostly what I’ve been told is that I lack “heart.”

It’s hard, being told you lack “heart.”  The terminology is off.  We tend to equate “heart” with “human-ness.”  Who wants to be told they lack human-ness?

It’s not like I go out of the way to create narratives and characters that lack emotional resonance.  The stories I write come at me organically, incorporating all that I’m thinking about and feeling at a given moment.  As whacked-out strange as some can be, they all ring “true” and honest to me. 

And yes, I try to craft characters that readers might be able to connect with.

A dear friend tells me that every time she publishes one of her stories, she’s inundated with emails sent by total strangers telling her how much they responded to her words.  It’s painful to admit how few times this has happened to me.

Sometimes I worry about myself.  It’s maddening.  What resonates for me is greeted with indifference by others.  I wonder if I experience the world in a fundamentally different way from everyone else—meaning, maybe it’s impossible for me to ever display the kind of heart some readers seek.

Or, as John Lennon sang, "No one I think is in my tree."

Luckily, calmer moments fill most of my days. 

I remind myself that emotional resonance and mimetic realism are not foremost on my list of objectives.  Instead, I try to engage readers through humor and absurdist elements. 

Still, it bothers me: everyone telling me that what they want to see is “heart.”

                                                                                             ~~~

Picture
Shirley Hazzard
Shirley Hazzard, in her Believer interview, said that, “People in power… become unreachable, unless through satire.”  Although she doesn’t explain her reasoning, I understand her point.

Realism attempts to create a known world, one in which the reader has already learned to navigate in whole or part through their various belief systems and prejudices.  Readers wade into these known worlds, positioning themselves morally and politically exactly as they might in their own “real” worlds.

Satire presents a slightly deformed world.  Qualities and beliefs that the writer questions are brought to the foreground and accentuated.  In this uncertain, slightly off-balanced world, readers become less sure about their moral and political postures.  Ideally, the will to judge (i.e., the employment of belief systems and prejudices) becomes secondary to their desire to explore the satirized world and its ramifications. 

Absurdism, which presents an even more deformed world, has the potential to raise deeper questions.  While satire may question the particular beliefs of a particular government official on a particular policy, Absurdism questions the legitimacy of socioeconomic, political, and spiritual belief systems.

“Autonomy” from the strictly real, according to Milan Kundera in The Art of The Novel, “allowed Franz Kafka to say things about our human condition… that no social or political thought could ever tell us.” 

While good realistic fiction may prompt readers to question their beliefs by the time they finish  a given work, good Absurdist fiction will prompt readers to suspend or question their beliefs in the opening pages.

No one however reads the Absurd for its emotional resonances.

The less recognizable “human” or “real” characters and situations become (i.e., the less familiar they are), the less emotionally invested readers become.  Readers are not apt to emotionally identify with deformed characters.

                                                                                             ~~~

While preparing my earlier post on reviews, I stumbled upon John Updike’s “rules” for writing book review.  First on his list is, “Try to understand what the author wished to do, and do not blame him for not achieving what he did not attempt.”

It’s debatable, of course, whether a reviewer can rightly know an author’s intentions, but it’s safe to say that not every writer is primarily interested in “heart” (has anyone ever really defined this term?) and emotional resonance.

So why must everything still be judged by ♥?


Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Adam Johnson
    Alan Cheuse
    Alexander Solzhenitsyn
    Alexi Zentner
    Amber Sparks
    Amy Rowland
    Andrew Wylie
    Andy Warhol
    Anna Snoekstra
    Ann Patchett
    Arsène Wenger
    Aubrey Hirsch
    B.A. Paris
    Barack Obama
    Ben Fountain
    Ben Marcus
    BEST DAY EVER
    Bob Dylan
    Book Reviews
    Bryan Furuness
    Cathy Day
    Children Of Paradise
    Chimamanda Adichie
    Christine Butterworth-McDermott
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan
    Dave Housley
    David Bowie
    David Foster Wallace
    David Lynn
    Donald Barthelme
    Donald Trump
    Don't You Cry
    Ed Falco
    E.M.Forster
    Emma Chapman
    Emmanuel Adebayor
    Flannery O'Connor
    Flash Fiction
    Frank Conroy
    Fred D'Aguiar
    F. Scott Fitzgerald
    Gabriel Blackwell
    George Harrison
    George Saunders
    Gillian Flynn
    Girija Tropp
    Harper Lee
    Heart
    Hillary Clinton
    I Will Never Leave You
    Jacob Appel
    James Lasdun
    James Tadd Adcox
    Jane Fonda
    Jeff Ell
    Jenniey Tallman
    John Cusack
    John Lennon
    John Updike
    Joyce Carol Oates
    J. Robert Lennon
    Julie Lawson Timmer
    Kaira Rouda
    Kate Atkinson
    Keith Banner
    Kenyon Review
    Kim Jong Il
    Kyle Minor
    Lance Olsen
    Len Kuntz
    Lenny Dykstra
    Leslie Pietrzyk
    Lily Hoang
    Lisa Jewell
    Lou Reed
    Luke Geddes
    Mary Kubica
    Melissa Febos
    Milan Kundera
    Molly Gaudry
    Nicholson Baker
    Notes For My Biographer
    Pablo Picasso
    Paula Hawkins
    Paul Maliszewski
    Paul Mccartney
    Philip Roth
    REAL: Regarding Arts & Letters
    Richard Peabody
    Rick Moody
    Robert Kloss
    Robert Smartwood
    Roxane Gay
    Shirley Hazzard
    S.J. Watson
    S.M. Thayer
    SM Thayer
    Stéphane Hessel
    Stuart Dybek
    Submission Fees
    Sven Birkerts
    Tadeusz Borowski
    The Beatles
    The Fall Guy
    The Girls In The Garden
    The Good Girl
    The Official Catalog Of The Library Of Potential Literature
    Thomas Mallon
    Tim O'Brien
    Tony Earley
    Umberto Eco
    Virginia Woolf
    Wells Tower
    Willem De Kooning
    Working Class Hero

    Archives

    August 2018
    January 2018
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.