Nick Kocz's Ridiculous Words
  • SM Thayer
  • About
  • Writing
  • Contact
  • Blog

Defining Deviancy Down & Aesthetic Tolerances

2/16/2011

 
Okay, so yesterday I wrote about Stéphane Hessel’s Indignez-Vous!, which concludes with the exhortation “TO CREATE IS TO RESIST; TO RESIST IS TO CREATE.”

Yes, I understand the skepticism.  As writers, we’ve been trained to mind-numbingly nod our heads at the feel-good platitudes about the worth of our work.  We instinctively clap upon hearing for the billionth time Shelley’s line about “Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world.”  And we even cheer for despicable Ezra Loomis Pound’s “Literature is news that stays news.”

But who are we kidding?  However, um, elegant Harry Reid and John Boehner may be, my hunch is that neither can write so much as a limerick.  If literature is “news,” how come it receives such scant attention?

In this case though, I believe Hessel is right if what is being created is not the same as everything else that’s already been created. 

I’m not one of those people who believe literature has to be proscriptive or even directly address sociopolitical issues.  But I think it ought to attempt to pose questions and scenarios that haven’t been posed before.  Innovative & imaginative forms can be the best means to voice our unease or indignation.  But you know this.  Just as contemporary installation art is capable of saying different things than classical marble sculpture, innovative literature can provoke different responses than traditional realism.

So why is innovative literature so disparaged in the marketplace?  Probably because there’s not enough of it.

I’ve been thinking about “Defining Deviancy Down,” the Daniel Patrick Moynihan essay first published in 1993.  Moynihan, an aide to four presidents and a four-term New York senator, was something of an intellectual in his day.  Putting aside his troubling use of “deviancy,” the essay is illuminating. 

Moynihan posited that society’s tolerance for criminal acts is relative.  In times of high crime, lesser criminal acts will be tolerated or even be deemed to be “normal.”  If the land was overrun by serial killers, we’d suddenly become a lot less fussy about prosecuting petty larceny so that we could concentrate our attentions on those serial killers.

In this circumstance, Moynihan writes, “society will choose not to notice behavior that would be otherwise controlled, or disapproved, or even punished.”

In other words, it’s the behavioral outliers that dictate our societal norms.

I wonder if the same idea could help explain society’s tolerance for artistic innovation and prevailing aesthetics.  Could aesthetics be dictated by the extremes?

Permit me the following illustration:
Picture
The first line represents a relatively constricted aesthetic marketplace.  The yellow oval represents the “sweet spot” of society’s tastes—books that fall within this mainstream range can be expected to have some currency; they may even sell.  The “1” dot, which might be marginally “imaginative,” represents about as far as mainstream tastes may go.

In that first line, the “3” dot represents the extreme of available “imponderably imaginative” works.  Because it lays at the extreme, my guess is that it will pass totally unnoticed by mainstream culture. 

Now imagine the second line.  Here, the bounds of imaginative literature are pushed even further.  While there may be more net imaginative works (dots 6-10) that are banished or ghettoized outside of the mainstream, their mere existence increases society’s tolerance for imaginative literature.  Works that otherwise would have been outside the mainstream (dots 2 & 3) are now within the mainstream—hugging the most conservative border of that mainstream.

To use a Gladwellian term, this is how imaginative literature can reach its “tipping point.”

Will it work overnight?  No.  But can it work?  Maybe.

Over 200,000 copies of Donald Barthelme’s SNOW WHITE were in print within its first year of publication.  Barthelme’s novel is an incredibly innovative work and, at times, incredibly challenging.  If it were published today, it would probably pass unnoticed.  So why was it such a success? 

My guess is that back then, publishers must also have been putting out a lot of books that were even more innovative than Barthelme’s—so many so that SNOW WHITE wasn’t seen as being extreme (or, to borrow Moynihan’s term, “deviant”) but “normal.”

[Political aside: I’ve always wondered why conservatives are so eager to nominate candidates for major offices who, to my tastes, seem so “extreme.” 

Now I think I know: people like Sarah Palin are necessary because they allow the John Boehners and Mitch McConnells of their ilk to appear positively “normal.”  They’ve broadened the political marketplace.  Politicians who twenty years ago would have been seen as too conservative to be viable candidates have been mainstreamed.]


Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Adam Johnson
    Alan Cheuse
    Alexander Solzhenitsyn
    Alexi Zentner
    Amber Sparks
    Amy Rowland
    Andrew Wylie
    Andy Warhol
    Anna Snoekstra
    Ann Patchett
    Arsène Wenger
    Aubrey Hirsch
    B.A. Paris
    Barack Obama
    Ben Fountain
    Ben Marcus
    BEST DAY EVER
    Bob Dylan
    Book Reviews
    Bryan Furuness
    Cathy Day
    Children Of Paradise
    Chimamanda Adichie
    Christine Butterworth-McDermott
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan
    Dave Housley
    David Bowie
    David Foster Wallace
    David Lynn
    Donald Barthelme
    Donald Trump
    Don't You Cry
    Ed Falco
    E.M.Forster
    Emma Chapman
    Emmanuel Adebayor
    Flannery O'Connor
    Flash Fiction
    Frank Conroy
    Fred D'Aguiar
    F. Scott Fitzgerald
    Gabriel Blackwell
    George Harrison
    George Saunders
    Gillian Flynn
    Girija Tropp
    Harper Lee
    Heart
    Hillary Clinton
    I Will Never Leave You
    Jacob Appel
    James Lasdun
    James Tadd Adcox
    Jane Fonda
    Jeff Ell
    Jenniey Tallman
    John Cusack
    John Lennon
    John Updike
    Joyce Carol Oates
    J. Robert Lennon
    Julie Lawson Timmer
    Kaira Rouda
    Kate Atkinson
    Keith Banner
    Kenyon Review
    Kim Jong Il
    Kyle Minor
    Lance Olsen
    Len Kuntz
    Lenny Dykstra
    Leslie Pietrzyk
    Lily Hoang
    Lisa Jewell
    Lou Reed
    Luke Geddes
    Mary Kubica
    Melissa Febos
    Milan Kundera
    Molly Gaudry
    Nicholson Baker
    Notes For My Biographer
    Pablo Picasso
    Paula Hawkins
    Paul Maliszewski
    Paul Mccartney
    Philip Roth
    REAL: Regarding Arts & Letters
    Richard Peabody
    Rick Moody
    Robert Kloss
    Robert Smartwood
    Roxane Gay
    Shirley Hazzard
    S.J. Watson
    S.M. Thayer
    SM Thayer
    Stéphane Hessel
    Stuart Dybek
    Submission Fees
    Sven Birkerts
    Tadeusz Borowski
    The Beatles
    The Fall Guy
    The Girls In The Garden
    The Good Girl
    The Official Catalog Of The Library Of Potential Literature
    Thomas Mallon
    Tim O'Brien
    Tony Earley
    Umberto Eco
    Virginia Woolf
    Wells Tower
    Willem De Kooning
    Working Class Hero

    Archives

    August 2018
    January 2018
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    September 2015
    February 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.